Fundamental
Changes Required in Modulation and Signal Processing for 4G
(Published
in Communications Systems Design Magazine - a CMP publication during
July 2001)
While 3G hasn't quite arrived,
designers are already thinking about 4G technology. With it comes
challenging RF and baseband design headaches.
Cellular service providers are slowly
beginning to deploy third-generation (3G) cellular services. As
access technology increases, voice, video, multimedia, and broadband
data services are becoming integrated into the same network. The
hope once envisioned for 3G as a true broadband service has all but
dwindled away. It is apparent that 3G systems, while maintaining the
possible 2-Mbps data rate in the standard, will realistically
achieve 384-kbps rates. To achieve the goals of true broadband
cellular service, the systems have to make the leap to a
fourth-generation (4G) network.
This is not merely a numbers game. 4G
is intended to provide high speed, high capacity, low cost per bit,
IP based services.
The goal is to have data rates up to
20 Mbps, even when used in such scenarios as a vehicle traveling 200
kilometers per hour. New design techniques, however, are needed to
make this happen, in terms of achieving 4G performance at a desired
target of one-tenth the cost of 3G.
The move to 4G is complicated by
attempts to standardize on a single 3G protocol. Without a single
standard on which to build, designers face significant additional
challenges. Table
1 compares some of the key parameters of 3G and 4G (4G does
not have any solid specification as of yet, so the parameters rely
on general proposals). It is clear that some standardization is in
order.
|
TABLE 1:
Key Parameters of 3g and 4 G Systems
|
|
|
3G
|
4G
|
|
Frequency band
|
1.8 - 2.5 GHz
|
2 - 8 GHz
|
|
Bandwidth
|
5 - 20 MHz
|
5
- 20 MHz
|
|
Data rate
|
Up to 2 Mbps
(384 kbps deployed)
|
Up to 20 Mbps
|
|
Access
|
W-CDMA
|
MC-CDMA or
OFDM (TDMA)
|
|
Forward error
correction
|
Convolutional
rate 1/2, 1/3
|
Concatenated
coding scheme
|
|
Switching
|
Circuit/packet
|
Packet
|
|
Mobile top
speeds
|
200 km/h
|
200 km/h
|
Multicarrier modulation
To achieve a 4G standard, a new
approach is needed to avoid the divisiveness we've seen in the 3G
realm. One promising underlying technology to accomplish this is
multicarrier modulation (MCM), a derivative of frequency-division
multiplexing. MCM is not a new technology; forms of multicarrier
systems are currently used in DSL modems, and digital audio/video
broadcast (DAB/DVB). MCM is a baseband process that uses parallel
equal bandwidth subchannels to transmit information. Normally
implemented with Fast Fourier transform (FFT) techniques, MCM's
advantages include better performance in the intersymbol
interference (ISI) environment, and avoidance of single-frequency
interferers. However, MCM increases the peak-to-average ratio (PAVR)
of the signal, and to overcome ISI a cyclic extension or guard band
must be added to the data.
Equation
1, describes peak to average adjustment - the difference of
the PAVR between MCM and a single carrier system is a function of
the number of subcarriers (N) as:

(1)
Any increase in PAVR requires an
increase in the linearity of the system to reduce distortion.
Proposed approaches to reduce PAVR have consequences, however. One
such technique is clipping the signal; this results in more
non-linearity. Linearization techniques can be used, but they
increase the cost of the system, and amplifier backoff may still be
required.
Cyclic extension works as follows: If
N is the original length of a block, and the channel's response is
of length M, the cyclically extended symbol has a new length of N +
M - 1. The image presented by this sequence, to the convolution with
the channel, looks as if it was convolved with a periodic sequence
consisting of a repetition of the original block of N. Therefore,
the new symbol of length N + M - 1 sampling periods has no ISI. The
cost is an increase in energy and uncoded bits added to the data. At
the MCM receiver, only N samples are processed, and M - 1 samples
are discarded, resulting in a loss in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as
shown in Equation
2.

(2)
Two different types of MCM are likely
candidates for 4G as listed in Table
1. These include multicarrier code division multiple access
(MC-CDMA) and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)
using time division multiple access (TDMA). Note: MC-CDMA is
actually OFDM with a CDMA overlay.
Similar to single-carrier CDMA
systems, the users are multiplexed with orthogonal codes to
distinguish users in MC-CDMA. However, in MC-CDMA, each user can be
allocated several codes, where the data is spread in time or
frequency. Either way, multiple users access the system
simultaneously.
In OFDM with TDMA, the users are
allocated time intervals to transmit and receive data. As with 3G
systems, 4G systems have to deal with issues of multiple access
interference and timing.
Differences between OFDM with TDMA
and MC-CDMA can also be seen in the types of modulation used in each
subcarrier. Typically, MC-CDMA uses quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK),
while OFDM with TDMA could use more high-level modulations (HLM),
such as, multilevel quadrature amplitude modulation (M-QAM) (where M
= 4 to 256). How-ever, to optimize overall system performance,
adaptive modulation can be used; where the level of QAM for all
subcarriers is chosen based on measured parameters.
Let's consider this at the component
level. The structure of a 4G transceiver is similar to any other
wideband wireless transceiver. Variances from a typical transceiver
are mainly in the baseband processing. A multicarrier modulated
signal appears to the RF/IF section of the transceiver as a
broadband high PAVR signal. Base stations and mobiles are
distinguished in that base stations transmit and receive/ decode
more than one mobile, while a mobile is for a single user. A mobile
may be a cell phone, a computer, or other personal communication
device.
The line between RF and baseband will
be closer for a 4G system. Data will be converted from analog to
digital or vice versa at high data rates to increase the flexibility
of the system. Also, typical RF components such as power amplifiers
and antennas will require sophisticated signal processing techniques
to create the capabilities needed for broadband high data rate
signals.
Figure
1 shows a typical RF/IF section for a transceiver. In the
transmit path inphase and quadrature (I&Q) signals are
upconverted to an IF, and then converted to RF and amplified for
transmission. In the receive path the data is taken from the antenna
at RF, filtered, amplified, and downconverted for baseband
processing. The transceiver provides power control, timing and
synchronization, and frequency information. When multicarrier
modulation is used, frequency information is crucial. If the data is
not synchronized properly the transceiver will not be able to decode
it.
From a high level, the structure of
the RF/IF portions of the mobile and base station are similar,
however, there are significant differences in their architectures
and performance requirements. Key drivers for both are performance
and cost; mobiles also need to consider power consumption and size.
4G processing
Figure
2 shows a high-level block diagram of the transceiver
baseband processing section. Given that 4G is based on a
multicarrier technique, key baseband components for the transmitter
and receiver are the FFT and its inverse (IFFT). In the transmit
path the data is generated, coded, modulated, transformed,
cyclically extended, and then passed to the RF/IF section. In the
receive path the cyclic extension is removed, the data is
transformed, detected, and decoded. If the data is voice, it goes to
a vocoder. The baseband subsystem will be implemented with a number
of ICs, including digital signal processors (DSPs), microcontrollers,
and ASICs. Software, an important part of the transceiver,
implements the different algorithms, coding, and overall state
machine of the transceiver. The base station could have numerous
DSPs. For example, if smart antennas are used, each user needs
access to a DSP to perform the needed adjustments to the antenna
beam.
Receiver section
4G will require an improved receiver
section, compared to 3G, to achieve the desired performance in data
rates and reliability of communication. As shown in Equation
3, Shannon's Theorem specifies the minimum required SNR for
reliable communication:

(3)
where C is the channel capacity
(which is the data rate), and BW is the bandwidth.
For 3G, using the 2-Mbps data rate in
a 5-MHz bandwidth, the SNR is only 1.2 dB. In 4G, approximately
12-dB SNR is required for a 20-Mbps data rate in a 5-MHz bandwidth.
This shows that for the increased data rates of 4G, the transceiver
system must perform significantly better than 3G.
With any receiver, the main issues
for efficiency and sensitivity are noise figure, gain, group delay,
bandwidth, sensitivity, spurious rejection, and power consumption.
4G is no exception; the sensitivity can be determined as shown in Equation
4 :

(4)
where KTo is the thermal noise (for
this equation it is -174 dBm), BW is the receiver bandwidth, NF is
the receiver noise figure, and SNRavgMCM is the average SNR for a
MCM system needed for an expected bit error rate.
For a 4G receiver using a 5-MHz RF
bandwidth, 16 QAM modulation and NF of 3 dB, the receiver
sensitivity is -87 dBm. For 3G, the receiver sensitivity needs to be
-122 dBm; the difference is due to the modulation and PAVR. This
illustrates the need to reduce PAVR by clipping or coding. Also the
gain is required to be linear, and the group delay must be flat over
the bandwidth of the signal.
The receiver front end provides a
signal path from the antenna to the baseband processor. It consists
of a bandpass filter, a low-noise amplifier (LNA), and a
downconverter. De-pending on the type of receiver there could be two
downconversions (as in a super-hetrodyne receiver), where one
downconversion converts the signal to an IF. The signal is then
filtered and then downconverted to or near baseband to be sampled.
The other configuration has one
downconversion, as in a homodyne (zero IF or ZIF) receiver, where
the data is converted directly to baseband.The challenge in the
receiver design is to achieve the required sensitivity,
intermodulation, and spurious rejection, while operating at low
power.
The first line of defense
The receiver bandpass filter is the
first line of defense to eliminate unwanted interference and noise.
This filter must be able to achieve the cutoff needed for each
bandwidth. In a 4G implementation, the bandwidth could be as low as
5 MHz and as high as 20 MHz. If the filter were to be only 5-MHz
wide, it would not have the capabilities to use the 20-MHz
bandwidth. However, if the filter is 20-MHz wide and the signal is
only 5-MHz wide, the extra interference would increase the noise and
reduce sensitivity. This means that a tunable filter is needed. One
option would be a bank of filters with different bandwidths, where
selection is made based on the need.
A typical LNA has a noise figure of
approximately 1 dB and a gain of about 20 dB. A trade-off is made
between gain and noise to provide the best solution. The LNA sets
the noise figure of the overall receiver, since it is one of the
first components of the receiver. Because of the high PAVR of the
signal, the LNA will also have to be very linear to minimize any
extra distortion.
The downconverter section of the
receiver will have to achieve good linearity and noise figure while
consuming minimal power. A measure of the linearity in the mixer
section is the spurious free dynamic range (SFDR). This is directly
related to the second and third order intermodulation products also
known as IP2 and IP3.
The analog-to-digital converter (ADC)
is the key component that can break the new system. System issues of
the ADC concern whether or not to use undersampling, the PAVR of the
signal, the bandwidth, and the sampling rate. For a 5-MHz bandwidth
signal a typical sampling rate would be 20 MHz. If IF sampling is
used, the aperture uncertainty or jitter must be low enough to
prevent errors.
The next requirement is the dynamic
range. For an MCM system using the theoretical PAVR for a 512-point
IFFT, the dynamic range required would be 80 dB, which is equal to
13 bits. This relationship is demonstrated in Equation
5, which shows quantization noise,determined from the link
budget as follows:

(5)
The desired quantization noise is
determined by the average ratio of average signal power to average
noise spectrum density measured in dB (Eb/No) for the subcarriers,
the data rate (DR), and backoff (which is generally 15 dB). The
constant 20 dB is added to the end to put the quantization noise 20
dB lower than the system noise. The number of bits can be calculated
as shown in Equation
6.

(6)
In this equation, fs is the sampling
rate. If the signal has interference or blocking, the ADC requires
additional bits. The required dynamic range of the ADC could
increase from 15 to 17 bits.
Baseband processing
The error correction coding of 4G has
not yet been proposed, however, it is known that 4G will provide
different levels of QoS, including data rates and bit error rates.
It is likely that a form of concatenated coding will also be used,
and this could be a turbo code as used in 3G, or a combination of a
block code and a convolutional code. This increases the complexity
of the baseband processing in the receive section.
4G baseband signal-processing
components will include ASICs, DSPs, microcontrollers, and FPGAs.
The receiver will take the data from the ADC, and then use it to
detect the proper signals. Baseband processing techniques such as
smart antennas and multi-user detection will be required to reduce
interference.
MCM is a baseband process. The
subcarriers are created using IFFT in the transmitter, and FFT is
used in the receiver to recover the data. A fast DSP is needed for
parsing and processing the data.
Different algorithms can be used to
create a smart antenna; the goal is to improve the signal by
adjusting the beam pattern of the antennas. The number of DSPs
needed to implement an smart antenna depends on the type of
algorithm used. The two basic types of smart antenna are
switched-beam antennas and adaptive arrays. The former selects a
beam pattern from a set of predetermined patterns, while the latter
dynamically steers narrow beams toward multiple users. Generally
speaking, SA is more likely be used in a base station than a mobile,
due to size and power restrictions.
Multi-user detection (MUD) is used to
eliminate the multiple access interference (MAI) present in CDMA
systems. Based on the known spreading waveform for each user, MUD
determines the signal from other users and can eliminate this from
the desired signal. Mobile devices do not normally contain the
spreading codes of the other users in the cell, so MUD will likely
be implemented only in base stations, where it can improve the
capacity of the reverse (mobile-to-base) link.
Transmitter section
The purpose of the transmitter is to
generate and send information. As the data rate for 4G increases,
the need for a clean signal also increases. One way to increase
capacity is to increase frequency reuse. As the cell size gets
smaller to accommodate more frequency reuse, smaller base stations
are required. Smaller cell sizes need less transmit power to reach
the edge of the cell, though better system engineering is required
to reduce intra-cell interference.
One critical issue to consider is
spurious noise. The regulatory agencies have stringent requirements
on the amount of unwanted noise that can be sent out of the range of
the spectrum allocated. In addition, excess noise in the system can
seriously diminish the system's capacity.
With the wider bandwidth system and
high PAVR associated with 4G, it will be difficult to achieve good
performance without help of linearity techniques (for example,
predistortion of the signal to the PA). To effectively accomplish
this task, feedback between the RF and baseband is required. The
algorithm to perform the feedback is done in the DSP, which is part
of the baseband data processing.
Power control will also be important
in 4G to help achieve the desired performance; this helps in
controlling high PAVR - different services need different levels of
power due to the different rates and QoS levels required. Therefore,
power control needs to be a very tight, closed loop. Baseband
processing is just as critical whether dealing with the receiver or
transmitter sections. As we've seed, RF and baseband work in tandem
to produce 4G signals. The baseband processing of a 4G transmitter
will obviously be more complicated than in a 3G design. Let's
consider the chain of command.
The digital-to-analog converter (DAC)
is an important piece of the transmit chain. It requires a high slew
rate to minimize distortion, especially with the high PAVR of the
MCM signals. Generally, data is oversampled 2.5 to 4 times; by
increasing the oversampling ratio of the DAC, the step size between
samples decreases. This minimizes distortion.
In the baseband processing section of
the transmit chain, the signal is encoded, modulated, transformed
using an IFFT, and then a cyclic extension is added. Dynamic packet
assignment or dynamic frequency selection are techniques which can
increase the capacity of the system. Feedback from the mobile is
needed to accomplish these techniques. The baseband processing will
have to be fast to support the high data rates.
Even as 3G begins to roll out, system
designers and services providers are looking forward to a true
wireless broadband cellular system, or 4G. To achieve the goals of
4G, technology will need to improve significantly in order to handle
the intensive algorithms in the baseband processing and the wide
bandwidth of a high PAVR signal. Novel techniques will also have to
be employed to help the system achieve the desired capacity and
throughput. High-performance signal processing will have to be used
for the antenna systems, power amplifier, and detection of the
signal.
Michael LeFevre is a
system engineer in broadband communications in Motorola's Wireless
Infrastructure Systems Group Division. He holds a MSEE from Brigham
Young University in Provo, Utah. He can be reached at michael.lefevre@motorola.com.
Peter Okrah received
his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Stanford University. He is
the Manager of 4G systems technologies research of the Wireless
Infrastructure Systems Division of the Motorola Semiconductor
Products Sector, Tempe, Arizona. He can be reached at at peter.okrah@motorola.com.