|
News
Issue #2002 - 11 (March 2002)
(Updated Mar.
20, 2002)
TECHNOLOGY
4G Cellular Services, Early
Arrival?
(Source: Network Magazine)
Here's something we don't
see often: a wireless technology that could actually arrive earlier
than predicted. Fourth-generation (4G) cellular services, intended
to provide mobile data at rates of 100Mbits/sec or more, were
originally scheduled for 2010. Some cell phone companies have moved
the target up to 2006, while rival wireless systems could bring
similar bandwidth to a few fortunate networkers a lot sooner.
Alas, the enthusiasm for 4G isn't due to accelerated progress;
it's because third-generation (3G) services have proven so
disappointing. Instead of one standard worldwide, there are three
incompatible systems in the United States alone. Voice is carried
over the circuit-switched infrastructure inherited from
second-generation (2G), not the promised IP. The touted streaming
video is just a low-resolution slideshow. Most importantly, the data
rates are closer to dial up than DSL.
This is partially due to the technology's immaturity: 3G systems
rolled out so far could be considered beta versions, with the real
thing still in the future. But 3G will never live up to its
creators' promises. Despite early excitement about data, the main
economic incentive for 3G is increased capacity for narrowband
voice. Though data rates will increase, there isn't enough bandwidth
to transfer large e-mail attachments quickly, let alone stream audio
or video at broadcast quality as the cell phone vendors first
claimed.
If you believe the industry, 4G will enable all this and more:
Many companies talk of holophones, remote-controlled cars, and
mobile virtual reality. Given their past record of hype, there are
good reasons not to believe the more outlandish predictions, but
there are also reasons to think that some aspects of 4G could be
real.
According to the Fourth-Generation Mobile Forum (www.4gmobile.com),
companies will have invested more than $30 billion in 4G by the end
of 2002. And unlike previous generations, 4G won't be a product of
the cellular industry alone. While the most advanced plans have come
from Japanese and European mobile operators, fixed wireless carriers
in the United States are beating a separate path to mobility. Most
exciting, new types of wireless LAN technology already offer speeds
approaching those of 4G.
2020 VISION
Despite its apparent novelty, 4G has been in gestation for more
than a decade. The first research took place in Europe during the
early 1990s, and was intended to investigate very high data rate
technologies that could serve the needs of mobile communications
until 2020.
The most advanced project was the Mobile Broadband System (MBS),
a collaboration between several companies and universities overseen
by the European Commission. MBS' inventors intended to create a
cellular system with low latency, guaranteed QoS, and a data rate of
OC-3 (155Mbits/sec)-thousands of times faster than anything
available today, let alone ten years ago. Incredibly, they
succeeded.
Built in 1995, the MBS prototype had a data rate of
"only" E3 (34Mbits/sec), though higher rates could be
achieved by using several links in parallel. It was tested in
several indoor and outdoor environments, including driving around a
city block at around 30 miles per hour. MBS' physical layer was
based on a variant of Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), used by
most 2G phones, and its higher layers were based on ATM-at that
time, still considered the networking protocol of the future.
MBS' inventors recognized that a prototype isn't the same as a
functional network, estimating that the system would take 15 years
to commercialize: The first deployments would be in 2010, with
widespread services by 2020. Halfway through that time, the
specification has changed. The physical layer will be based on
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM), a technology
designed to resist interference caused by a radio signal's multiple
paths. And ATM has been abandoned in favor of IPv6.
There are also ongoing discussions over what radio spectrum the
system can use. The prototype used the 60GHz band, where there's a
large amount of unused bandwidth, but range is limited to about 100
meters (m). Therefore, a nationwide network would require millions
of base stations, each one at the center of tiny "picocells."
Europe's Wireless Strategic Initiative (www.ist-wsi.org)
is also considering spectrum at 40GHz, which would allow larger
cells and reduce the cost of constructing networks.
While other wireless generations have focused on voice, perhaps
combined with other types of traffic such as short messages, MBS is
intended to be service-independent: It's a big pipe for data, which
devices can use for any applications. Japan is so far the only
country where mobile data has proven popular and profitable, so it's
no surprise that Japanese operators are leading the race to 4G.
The popularity of the i-mode service, which provides limited Web
access through cell phones, surprised everyone-even its creators.
"We were skeptical," says Nobuharo Ono, president and CEO
of NTT DoCoMo U.S.A (www.nttdocomo.com).
"The display wasn't very big, the data rate was only
9.6Kbits/sec. We thought, maybe it's not attractive to
customers."
Instead, i-mode made DoCoMo the world's largest ISP. The company
hopes that true mobile broadband will enable it to replace fixed
access entirely, and it plans to have a 4G system operational by
2006. Ono also predicts that the future of mobile data is more than
Web surfing and access to corporate servers. DoCoMo thinks there's a
big market for "machine-to-machine" communication:
vehicles that take directions from a central traffic computer, or
domestic appliances that automatically reorder supplies.
DoCoMo also hopes to improve 3G systems so they reach the hyped
data rates. Vendors once claimed that 3G would enable full duplex
access at 2Mbits/sec, but every real system built so far has an
absolute maximum speed of 384Kbits/sec downstream, 64Kbits/sec
upstream. "In the near future [2004], we will have 2Mbit/sec
access," says Ono.
Just as current upgrades that add packet switching to digital
cellular systems are known as "2.5G," improved versions of
3G are often called "3.5G." The upgrade closest to
reality, set to be standardized in 2002, is called High Speed
Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA). This uses better modulation
techniques to reach up to 10Mbits/sec. All users in a cell share the
capacity, but in a very efficient way called "extreme
unfairness," which gives more bandwidth to people in
interference-free areas instead of trying to portion it out equally.
HSDPA only works with Wideband Code Division Multiple Access
(W-CDMA), the worldwide 3G standard developed in Europe. Many
American operators are instead using narrower-band CDMA systems,
which are theoretically more spectrally efficient. (See
"Waiting for Wireless in the United States," December
2001, page 54.) They achieve this efficiency by using the same
modulation techniques as HSDPA, leaving no room for expansion.
Mobileinfo Comments & Advisory: We
welcome ongoing research at the academic research level of the next
generation (we mean beyond 3G) wireless networks. It is only through
this type of research that we would solve the speed and capacity
problems that we face today. However, we are afraid that we do not share
the enthusiasm indicated in the headline of the network magazine. There
are serious shortcomings in the analysis and this concept of 4G network
is based on a monolithic architecture that uses wide-area wireless
solution as the underpinning. To us, a network design that does not
recognize the mobile density of users ( a la hot spots) is really
theoretical and uneconomical. The scientists have not demonstrated that
they have solved the fundamental problems of radio physics i.e. distance
coverage of a signal goes down as you increase the speed and also as you
go up the frequency band. Economics and systems management of such a
network with micro or pico cells are poor, even if the cost of these
base stations became extremely low. To us, the only thing that makes
technological, systems engineering and economic sense is a wireless
network architecture that is based on a hybrid 4G design that utilizes
the best features of broadband, wireless LANs, spectrally-more efficient
wireless wide area networks ( a la W-CDMA), OFDM, smart antennas (a la
Array networks) and multi-band software-controlled radios.
Unfortunately, lot of organizations egos will have to be swallowed
before such an architecture is created by a network integrator. We
welcome criticism, debate and discussion on this.
For your comments, click
here.
Note: This news release may contain
forward-looking statements. Readers should take appropriate caution in
developing plans utilizing these products, services and technology
architectures. All trademarks used in this summary are
the property of their respective owners.
|