|
News
Issue #2003 - 15
(May 2003)
(Updated May
8, 2003)
TECHNOLOGY
2003 - The Year Of The IP Phone?
In this economy and in the business telecom market in general (both of which are down, as you likely know), so-called LAN Telephony (meaning business phone systems that are by their nature tied to the local business datacom network) grew in Station Set shipments some 60% over the previous year. In-Stat/MDR says this is the year where "when IP station shipments first exceed traditional PBX stations."
"This market's size is tied closely to two things: the size of the enterprise voice market and the percent of enterprise voice solutions that migrate to IP," says Brian Strachman, a Senior Analyst with In-Stat/MDR.
"While the overall enterprise voice market is down, the percent of migrations to LAN Telephony is up, resulting in growth, and while few companies are scrapping perfectly good PBXs in favor of an IP system, an increasing number are choosing IP instead of a traditional PBX."
In-Stat/MDR has also found that:
- In 2001, 23.7% of enterprise telephone stations sold in the US were IP based, while in 2002 that number jumped to 46.3%. This stellar growth was predicated by improved products, increased numbers of traditional vendors offering IP, and a movement in the buying community towards future-proofing their networks.
- Cisco Systems remains the 500 pound gorilla in the enterprise VoIP space (as well as the enterprise networking market) and there is no sign that will change in the near future. Cisco's sales constitute over 1/3 of the total market, with their closest competitor barely halving that amount.
- Although the enterprise telephone system market was down by 18%, in 2002 from 2001, the IP PBX market continued to grow. Therefore, IP PBX is garnering a larger piece of a shrinking pie and every year an increasing percentage of the voice systems that are sold are IP. The IP PBX will continue to have success, particularly if the economy improves and the total number of enterprise voice system sales increases.
The report, "LAN Telephony 2003: IP or Nothing", looks at the overall LAN Telephony market, specific verticals, technology changes and market drivers. It includes a profile on the products and strategy of all of the major vendors, as well as market shares. It then forecasts revenues the LAN Telephony market by lines, systems, and revenues, through 2007.
Source: In-Stat/MDR Report
MobileInfo Comments and Advisory: IP
phones will stay as a novelty for the enterprise customers for some
time. There is a lot of ground to be covered by IP phone
manufacturers and a lot of software to be debugged before users can
get the reliable and high-quality service that they are used to. Let
us start with building the functionality in future PBXes and
switches first and start trying these things out in niche
applications. Some day in future (several years hence), we can start
using IP phones on true end-to-end IP networks of the carriers and
at still a later date, on enterprise IP networks. Are we putting
cold water on IP phones? Not at all, we are just cognizant of the
time it takes to turn a technology over, especially when we are used
to the reliability of current voice networks networks. Nonetheless
we must start somewhere. With more and more PBXes with IP phone
support, we should start seeing limited action. Ever-increasing
popularity of Wi-Fi and IP phones make the market more viable but
also more complex. Can we build an IP phone that will work with LANs
as well as on PBXes? NEC is doing that.
Having said that, is anybody designing Wi-Fi networks with the
assumptions that most of our phones might be IP-based. Not that we
know of. At least the first version of WiFi networks will not
support much of IP traffic.
Note: This news release may contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and section 21E of Securities Exchange act of
1934 in USA. Similar provisions exist in other countries. There is no
assurance that the stipulated plans of vendors will be implemented.
MobileInfo does not warrant the authenticity of the information.
Readers should take appropriate caution in developing plans utilizing
these products, services and technology architectures. All
trademarks used in this summary are the property of their respective
owners.
|